Christian Research Dispensary
1999-2000 Book & Tape Catalog

The Presumption of Guilt
in a Modern Babylonish Society

by Dan Gentry 03/05/02

You may have seen a bumper sticker (or heard the expression) saying, “Kill ‘em all, and let God sort them out.”  This, of course, is the height of what The WORD (Holy Bible) calls presumption and, unfortunately, is the motto of a society in open rebellion against its Creator.

A variation on this is “Shoot first, ask questions later.”  It seems to be the motto of the FBI, BATF and other Federal alphabet agencies, when imposing martial law upon its “subjects” (1), to exhibit a lust for power, and frighten all witnesses into walking the line for “democratic” fascism.

In a court of Common Law, on the other hand, a man is “Innocent until (and UNLESS ) proven guilty.”  How many courts or tribunals do YOU know where the word “unless” is an integral part of the judicial process? On the immensely popular police (po-licy, get it?) program, COPS, the deep male voice intones, “All SUBJECTS are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.” How convenient. One never sees a “court of law” if one is a “subject,” for such is a slave, and administrative measures are applied, rather than law.

In such a wicked, Babylonish society as the United States in 2002, even the mere suspicion of variation from codes and changing norms is reason for your investigation, or reporting to the “authorities.” For example, consider the case of Brian & Ruth Christine and their three oldest girls Bethany, Miriam and Lidia.(2)

Brian & Ruth are facing the possibility of 7½ years-to-life in prison, and for what? While traveling in Oregon as a family in their motor home, they had parked in a public library lot. A passerby observed to “officials” that one of the daughters “looked a little peaked,” and the PRESUMPTION was that the parents must have abused or neglected her, although the girl had merely been experiencing a cold, and was somewhat pallid. Enter the goon squad. After DEMANDING entry to the motor home, and questioning the girl in her parents’ absence, the parents were arrested on charges of “neglect,” their three daughters KIDNAPED from them by the “State of Oregon” (a corporate “person” possessing no God-given rights).

After coming up with bail a few days later, Brian & Ruth were released and requested to see their children. No way, says Oregon. Because the parents allegedly refused to undergo the State’s psychological evaluations and “counseling,” and resisted what they considered to be unlawful intrusions on their rights, they were being punitively punished without a trial. After relenting, they STILL were denied right to see their children, and were told the girls would have to be put out to adoption!

Pushed to “the edge” by bureaucracy run amok, the parents did something outsiders would shudder at: they commandeered a State car “transporting” their children (transport is a commercial term and, in this case, is the way Oregon viewed the girls, as property of the State of Oregon), and fled to Montana. This exacerbated a bad situation, of course, and led to a host of charges which could permanently DESTROY this family.

What does The WORD (Holy Bible) have to say about this, and other presumption? Read with me in Numbers 15:30-31:

But the person who commits sin wittingly (by presumption), whether he be of you or of the proselytes, the same blasphemes before YHVH-God; and that person shall be cut off from among his people. Because he has despised the word of YHVH-God and has broken his commandments, that person shall be utterly cut off; his iniquity shall be upon him.

In other words, this is a capital offense. Not to mention the fact that KIDNAPING (men-stealing in Bible terms) is a capital offense, as well (Exodus 21:16; Deuteronomy 24:7). Parties to actions such as those taken against the Christines are in a VERY SERIOUS position before the Creator of the Universe. How will they explain themselves on their judgment day? Let us read further, in Deuteronomy 17:12-13:

And the man who will do presumptiously, and will not hearken to the priest who stands to minister there before YHVH your God, or to the judge, THAT MAN SHALL BE PUT TO DEATH; you shall destroy the evildoers from Israel. And all the people shall hear, and fear, and DO NO MORE PRESUMPTIOUSLY.

I am sure the “officials” of the god called the “State of Oregon” think they have been given divine sanction for putting an end to child abuse, based on an errant interpretation of Romans 13:1-7, Titus 3:1, and 1 Peter 2:13-14, even though these are clearly in the context of GODLY authority, or those civil rulers who have conformed to this high goal and purpose. They are NOT blanket power grants. Such tyrants should consider James 2:13:

For a judgment without mercy will be on him WHO DOES NOT SHOW MERCY; for you exalt yourselves by having mercy over judgment.

We live in a judgment-oriented society, a Judaized society, one dominated by rumor, innuendo and compelled performance. The WORD, in judgment of all matters, requires DILIGENT INQUISITION (Deuteronomy 19:18-19) and the testimony of at least TWO or THREE witnesses (under oath) (Deuteronomy 17:6; 19:15; Matthew 18:16; 2 Corinthians 13:1; 1 Timothy 5:19; Hebrews 10:28-29). None of this Communistic kangaroo court nonsense, based on single, anonymous complainants, and hearsay.

Presumption falls into the province of intellectual prostitution, and is often accompanied by hypocrisy. I am sure Jesus Christ was writing names, dates and places in the sand when pressed to consent to judgment against the woman caught in adultery (John 8:1-11). Jesus could read between the lines, and knew these accusers were likely guilty of the same crime. Better examine yourself for hypocrisy: it makes for loss of face on Judgment Day!

Jesus condemned such hypocrites as the unjust steward in Matthew 25: 14-30. The one who his one talent (money), and subsequently charged his master with being a “hard and austere man” (verse 24) was told by his Lord, “If you thought I was such a man, you should have acted as a thief and robber by putting the money in a bank to collect interest (usury) on it.” (Also in Luke 19:11-28).

Which leads me to the grossly misnamed Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tool Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (“USA Patriot” Act, for short), H.R. 3162, passed by the House of Representatives on October 24, 2001, in the shadow of the September 11 tragedy, and signed into law by President George “Dubya” Bush.

This magnum opus of presumption, read by very few who voted for it, provides for previously unimaginable regulation, restriction and even abolition of God-given rights, all in the name of “national security” and “peace and safety” (Perhaps the drafters of this behemoth should read 1 Thessalonians 5:1-3). Among other things, it suspends the extraordinary common law writ of habeas corpus, and limits judicial review in many cases, provides for unheard of domestic espionage, spying and eavesdropping on citizens by public “officials,” and presents broad and insubstantial parameters for defining who is a terrorist, or potential terrorist. It addresses anyone who “causes, threatens to cause” or “has as their aim to cause adverse effects upon” the American economy or U.S. foreign policy. Like the political detention and labor camps of World War 2, where American citizens critical of, and conscientiously objecting to, America’s foreign policy were “rounded up” like lemmings, without being charged with a crime. I know, because my father was among them.

It is ironic that the Taliban soldiers captured and airlifted out of their own land to Cuba, are being held without charges, not as “prisoners of war” (POW’s), which would be afforded a modicum of decent treatment under the Geneva Convention, and are instead labeled “detainees” and hence are tortured and deprived of the most basic of needs and recourse. This also happened following World War 2, when General Eisenhower had his troops round up innocent German citizens and soldiers into concentration camps and deprived them of life, liberty, property and human dignity, using the term “disarmed enemy forces” (DEF’s), instead of “prisoners of war.” Even the Nazis were more humane in their treatment of captured Allied troops. Inhumane treatment is not the history of warfare, generally, in Celto-Saxon nations, but more closely resembles the methods of Ghengis Khan, or other warlords of the Far East. This is a shame in the face of our Celto-Saxon race, and we WILL be judged for it.

In conclusion, let us closely examine our lives, and the actions of those who would “rule over us” instead of representing us, or the states in a national government. Let us not be found guilty of the sin and crimes of presumption and false accusation. Everything we do in the world spotlight has an impact, and consequence. Let us not be weighed in the balances of YHVH-God’s justice, and found lacking.



Footnotes:

1 Legally speaking, a “subject” is a servant beholden to one’s lord, or master. In the case of United States Citizens (citizens by purview of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution for the united States of America, 1789), they are “subject” to any and all acts of Congress, and are NOT freemen and women, referenced in the Body of the Constitution, having inalienable rights from their God. The 14th Amendment was meant to create a new class of citizenship (“subject-citizenship”) for the freed Negro slaves. It was far inferior to the citizenship in the individual states, enjoyed by Aryan people here, up to that time. Since 1868, Aryan (white) people have gradually traded their God-given rights for the position of servant to the very body (Congress) THEY created !

2 Contact Steele@PlainLawTalk.com for further details on the Christine case.


Christian Research
P.O. Box 385
Eureka Springs, Arkansas [ 72632-0385 ]
Phone / FAX: (501) 253-7185 * E-Mail